专题:Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

This cluster of papers focuses on methods and guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and evidence synthesis in research. It covers topics such as the PRISMA statement, measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, assessing risk of bias, detecting publication bias, and interpreting effect sizes. The papers also discuss reporting guidelines, quality assessment tools, and diagnostic accuracy in research.
最新文献
The Quality of Evidence of and Engagement With Video Medical Claims

article Full Text OpenAlex

Creating an Indexing Scheme for Case Series Articles

article Full Text OpenAlex

Mapping Methodology to Identify Research Gaps and Priorities in Existing Scoping Reviews - A Scoping Review

article Full Text OpenAlex

Response to Letter to Editor: “Comment on Impact of Needle Gauge Selection on Sample Adequacy in Ultrasound-Guided Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”

review Full Text OpenAlex

Some newer & simpler biostatistical approaches for more credible clinical research

article Full Text OpenAlex

Methodology and Conflict of Interest Management: 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations

article Full Text OpenAlex

Predicting replication outcomes and generalizability of results

article Full Text OpenAlex

Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials of embryo diagnostics: phase 3

review Full Text OpenAlex

Is it all relative? Proposing the use of marginal effects for meta-analysis of binary outcomes in criminology and criminal justice

article Full Text OpenAlex

PSMA PET/CT Reporting: Real-Life Inconsistencies, Heterogeneity, and Underutilization of Scoring Systems and Interpretation Frameworks

article Full Text OpenAlex

近5年高被引文献
PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis

article Full Text OpenAlex 2513 FWCI532.4496363

Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

article Full Text OpenAlex 1347 FWCI285.80017243

TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods

article Full Text OpenAlex 1160 FWCI282.34366289

Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

article Full Text OpenAlex 1070 FWCI227.72662141

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

article Full Text OpenAlex 848 FWCI181.39828296

The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials

article Full Text OpenAlex 801 FWCI286.80283413

Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement

article Full Text OpenAlex 683 FWCI331.44385053

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

book Full Text OpenAlex 679 FWCI96.23396218

Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports

review Full Text OpenAlex 620 FWCI134.19992876

A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)

article Full Text OpenAlex 575 FWCI373.30309236